Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Passing of Debbie Hill, sister of Jeff Stier

May we all only know good times and simcha and may the family be comforted amongst the mourners of zion and israel

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Elmora Website <elmorawebsite@thejec.org>
Date: Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:24 PM
Subject: [ElmoraShulAnnouncement] Passing of Debbie Hill, daughter of Susan & Aaron Stier
To: ESA.mailing.list@the.net


We regretfully inform you of the passing of the daughter of Susan & Aaron Stier. The funeral will take place on Wednesday December 16th at 1pm in the JEC Elmora Avenue main shul. 
 
Shiva will be observed at 1131 Harding Road, Elizabeth (289-7866) until Tuesday morning December 22nd.  Visitng hours are 10am-noon, 2-5pm and 7-10pm.  Davening times are as follows.  Shacharis: Thursday and Friday at 6:45am, Sunday 7am, Monday and Tuesday at 6:50am.  Mincha Wednesday and Thursday 4:20pm, Sunday and Monday 4:25pm.
 
Susan and Aaron will remain in their home during the entire week of shiva.  However, their son Jeff will be returning to his home (in NYC) on motzai Shabbos to complete shiva.  Their son-in-law Ira will return to Florida (901 West 47th Street, Miami Beach; 305-673-2009) on Sunday afternoon to complete shiva.
 
May the family be comforted among the mourners of Tzion and Yerushalayim.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
You're receiving this message because you are
subscribed to the Elmora Shul Announcements list.

To unsubscribe or to send any comments to the
list moderators, please reply to this message. Thank you.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Davetrek-Friends" group.
To post to this group, send email to davetrek-friends@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to davetrek-friends+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/davetrek-friends?hl=en.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Study says howling wind more likely to wake men than crying babies

whats amazing is that babies are not even in the top 10 for men!

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/6684362/Buzzing-flies-more-likely-to-wake-men-than-crying-babies-study.html

Buzzing flies more likely to wake men than crying babies: study

Men are more likely to be woken up by the sound of a buzzing fly or howling wind than by a crying baby, new research shows.

 

However for women, whether or not they are mothers, there is no other noise more likely to stop them sleeping than that of a wailing infant, according to scientific tests measuring brain activity.

The results of the study into which sounds most disrupt the usual patterns of activity in the brain suggest a marked difference in the sexes.

For men, the sound that most stops them sleeping is a car alarm going off nearby, followed by the howling of the wind and the buzzing of a fly.

The sound of a baby crying does not even register on the top ten of sounds likely to distub their slumber, according to research commissioned by Lemsip Max All Night Cold & Flu Tablets.

The tests were carried out by experts at research laboratory MindLab as part of their research into the importance of a good night's sleep.

MindLab recreated a 'sleep environment' for each volunteer before playing the sounds and measuring the results on an EEG - electroencephalograhy - machine to measure how regular brain activity is disturbed by them.

Separate research shows 29 per cent of all adults suffer a disturbed night's sleep between five and seven nights a week and a further 27 per cent are woken up once or twice a week.

Asked what keeps them awake, 54 per cent of women said it was their partner's snoring and one in ten said they were kept awake by flatmates or others having sexual intercourse

One in three (33 per cent) of both men and women have moved to a spare room just to get some sleep, said Lemsip Max to launch a new All Night Cold & Flu Tablets brand.

Other sounds which disturb both men and women are that of drunken rowdiness, often from a nearby pub at closing time or late night revellers outside their home.

Stefan Gaa, Lemsip Director, said: We all lead busy lives, so it is important to try and get a good nights sleep.

"However with the winter months upon us, many of us could suffer from the symptoms of cold and flu which can lead to interrupted sleep.

"This is why we have developed Lemsip Max All Night Cold & Flu Tablets, which can ease your symptoms so you can sleep."

Psychologist Dr David Lewis of MindLab added: "There is nothing more likely to leave you feeling drained and depressed than disturbed sleep, especially when this happens over several nights.

"As this unique study shows while some sounds, for instance your partner coughing or snoring beside you, disturb men and women equally, other noises such as a howling wind cause men to be more disturbed than women.

"Women are more likely to be disturbed by a crying baby."

He continued: "These differing sensitivities may represent evolutionary differences that make women sensitive to sounds associated with a potential threat to their children while men are more finely tuned to disturbances posing a possible threat to the whole family."

Women are more likely than men to find their sleep disturbed and men are more likely to be able to go back to sleep once they have been woken up, said the study.

Top ten sounds most likely to wake men:

1.Car alarm; 2.Howling wind; 3.Buzzing fly; 4.Snoring; 5.Noise from drains; 6.Crickets chirruping; 7.Sirens; 8.Clock ticking; 9.Drilling/workmen 10.Dripping tap;

Top ten sounds most likely to wake women:

1.Baby crying; 2.Dripping tap; 3.Rowdiness; 4.Snoring; 5.Buzzing fly; 6.Drilling/workmen; 7.Sirens; 8.Car alarm; 9.Howling wind; 10.Noise from drains.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Davetrek-Friends" group.
To post to this group, send email to davetrek-friends@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to davetrek-friends+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/davetrek-friends?hl=en.

Friday, November 27, 2009

'herbivore' men in japan, who are more interested in sewing, baking and crocheting clothes than dating or women...

has this been seen yet on the west side? they also seem to have 'carnivore women' in japan too...


http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120696816

this is really try - listen to the story above


November 25, 2009

The sensitive New Age man has finally arrived in the land of the salaryman. But there is a catch — a particularly important one in Japan, where the declining birthrate has caused alarm: The new Japanese man doesn't appear to be interested in women or sex.

In Tokyo on the weekends, the trendy area of Harajuku is a melting pot of urban tribes: Lolita goths bat their fake eyelashes, while the punks glower.

Away from the strutting are the retiring wallflowers, a quiet army of sweet young men with floppy hair and skinny jeans. These young men are becoming known as Japan's "herbivores" — from the Japanese phrase for "grass-eating boys" — guys who are heterosexual but who say they aren't really interested in matters of the flesh.

They are drawn to a quieter, less competitive life, focusing on family and friends — and eschewing the macho ways of the traditional Japanese male.

They include men such as Yukihiro Yoshida, a 20-something economics student, who is a self-confessed herbivore. "I don't take initiative with women, I don't talk to them," he says, blushing. "I'd welcome it if a girl talked to me, but I never take the first step myself."

Multiple recent surveys suggest that about 60 percent of young Japanese men — in their 20s and early 30s — identify themselves as herbivores. Their Sex and the City is a television show called Otomen, or Girly Guys. The lead character is a martial arts expert, the manliest guy in the whole school. But his secret passions include sewing, baking and crocheting clothes for his stuffed animals.

"I will hide my true nature," he vows in the first episode, as he sews secretly, shut away in his living room. "At all times, I will be a man — a real Japanese man," he says.

But what does that mean?

"It's not so much that men are becoming more like women. It's that the concept of masculinity is changing," says Katsuhiko Kokobun. From his perch at Guzzle, the popular Harajuku hair salon he owns, Kokobun is at the front line of the latest trends.

Over the years, he has seen more and more men coming into the salon — men who he describes as "more modest, less demanding, kind of passive; they accept what they're told." He's noticed that nowadays they're demanding more traditionally female treatments. "We do have eyebrow plucking and facials for men," he says, smiling. "Eyebrow plucking is very popular among high school boys."

It is, perhaps, no coincidence that Yasuhito Sekine's eyebrows are perfectly groomed. The changing tastes of Japanese men are quite literally what take up his days. He works for an Internet service provider and operates Sweets Club, an online group for men who like desserts. Set up in January, it already has about 1,000 members who congregate — online and in person — to debate the virtues of different brands of strawberry shortcake. It's something that Sekine says would have been unthinkable 20 years ago.

Back [in the 1980s], Japanese men had to be passionate and aggressive, but now those characteristics are disliked. Our members have very mild personalities. They simply enjoy what they like without prejudice. They are not limited by expectations.

- Yasuhito Sekine, a self-described herbivore

"Back then, lots of men liked desserts, but it was considered uncool. Cool men had to like alcohol or spicy food. I've discovered my father likes eating dessert, but he never showed it in the past," Sekine says.

Put through his paces with an impromptu taste test, Sekine praises peach gelatin as fresh-tasting. He is not so keen on coffee gelatin with cream — a macho dessert if ever there was one — labeling it "retro." He believes his dessert club shows that young Japanese men are asserting their individuality, reflecting a change in values from Japan's booming 1980s.

"Back then, Japanese men had to be passionate and aggressive, but now those characteristics are disliked. Our members have very mild personalities. They simply enjoy what they like without prejudice. They are not limited by expectations," Sekine says.

Japan's top expert on herbivores, Maki Fukasawa, believes they were born from the lost decade of economic stagnation. She christened the tribe in 2006 and recently wrote a book called The Herbivore Generation, which breaks herbivores down into 23 distinct subcategories. She argues that the herbivores are rebelling against the salaryman generation of their fathers, consciously turning away from the macho mores and conspicuous consumption of that era.

"They have some feelings of revulsion towards the older generation," says Fukasawa. "They don't want to have the same lives. And the impact of the herbivores on the economy is very big. They're such big news now because sales are down, especially of status products like cars and alcohol."

She says the advent of the herbivores could bring positive changes. Herbivores may lack ambition, but they are driven by a strong sense of community and family, which she believes many of them lacked while growing up.

"In a sense, their fathers neglected their families. They were involved in Japanese-style salaryman lifestyles, going out with their bosses every night, while herbivores are closer to their families and friends," Fukasawa says.

But there are fears about the financial and social impact of herbivores. Their low levels of spending and lack of interest in sex invoke two of Japan's biggest problems: its lackluster economy and declining birthrate. Herbivores like to be friends with women — but for many, that's as far as it goes.

In the streets of Harajuku, Alex Fujita explains why he is not interested in taking it any further.

"Nowadays, women have more education and enjoy working. Women are scary now," he says.

And, of course, there is a name, too, for the economically empowered working Japanese women who know what they want: the carnivore women. With herbivore boys and carnivore girls, it seems the land of samurai, sumo wrestlers and geisha girls is remaking its gender landscape anew.




--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Davetrek-Friends" group.
To post to this group, send email to davetrek-friends@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to davetrek-friends+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/davetrek-friends?hl=en.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

are conscientiousness & self disciplined folks less susceptible to Alzheimer's?

The Alzheimer's-resistant personality
Virtue, goes the old saying, is its own reward. But a new study has found that self-disciplined, highly organized people get a bonus: They're less susceptible to Alzheimer's disease. The study, which looked at how personality and behavior may affect the incidence of Alzheimer's, began with a personality survey of 997 healthy but elderly Catholic nuns and priests in the Chicago area. Researchers then tracked their mental states between the years 1994 and 2006. Nuns and priests who received a high score for "conscientiousness'' were 89 percent less likely to develop Alzheimer's-type dementia than their less-meticulous peers. "These are people who control impulses, and tend to follow norms and rules," study author Robert Wilson tells New Scientist. Curiously, autopsies on the subjects who died during the study found no reduced incidence of Alzheimer's brain plaques among those with conscientious personalities; in fact, researchers found that the brains of the various personality types showed equal rates of tangled proteins associated with the disease. Wilson suggests that the difference may be in the way that disciplined people use their brains—they're more likely to think with their frontal lobes. Using this part of the brain, which is responsible for decision-making and planning, may make one less vulnerable to impaired thinking caused by lesions in other areas, he says.

Self-discipline may reduce Alzheimer's risk

People who are meticulous and "finish what they start" may have a reduced risk of developing Alzheimer's disease, according to a study involving Catholic nuns and priests.

The most conscientious and self-disciplined individuals were found to be 89% less likely to develop this form of dementia than their peers over the course of the 12-year study.

Robert Wilson at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois, US, and colleagues followed 997 healthy Catholic nuns, priests and Christian brothers between 1994 and 2006. Early on in the study, participants completed a personality test to determine how conscientious they were.

Based on answers to 12 questions such as "I am a productive person who always gets the job done", they received a score ranging from 0 to 48. On average, volunteers scored 34 points in the test.

Controlled impulses

Volunteers also underwent regular neurological examinations and cognitive tests. Over the lifetime of the study, 176 of the 997 participants developed Alzheimer's disease. However, those with the highest score on the personality test - 40 points or above - had an 89% lower chance of developing the debilitating condition than participants who received 28 points or lower.

"These are people who control impulses, and tend to follow norms and rules," Wilson told New Scientist.

Previous studies suggest that exercise and intellectual stimulation can decrease the risk of Alzheimer's disease. But the link between self-discipline and a reduced risk of the illness remained strong even after researchers discounted these factors from their study. Subjects still had a 54% lower chance of developing the condition.

Exactly why conscientiousness should have an impact on Alzheimer's risk remains unclear, says Wilson. He notes that brain autopsies conducted on 324 of the study's participants failed to resolve the mystery.

Alzheimer's test?

Earlier work has linked the presence of plaques and protein tangles within the brain to Alzheimer. Yet, in general, the brains of those who scored highly on the conscientiousness test had as many plaques and protein tangles as those of subjects who scored lower.

Wilson suggests that more meticulous and conscientious individuals may have more active frontal brain regions, an area that is responsible for decision-making and planning. Increased activity in this region may perhaps compensate for a decline in function in other brain regions, he speculates.

Based on the new findings, doctors could perhaps consider certain patients at greater risk of dementia, says Ross Andel at the University of South Florida, US. "This is a study about identifying people at risk," he says.

Journal reference: Archives of General Psychiatry (vol 64, p 1204)

Mental Health - Discover the latest research in our continuously updated special report.


--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Davetrek-Friends" group.
To post to this group, send email to davetrek-friends@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to davetrek-friends+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/davetrek-friends?hl=en.

can money buy you happiness? perhaps, but not in the ways you think...

Happiness: A buyer's guide

Money can improve your life, but not in the ways you think

By Drake Bennett  |  August 23, 2009


http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/08/23/happiness_a_buyers_guide?mode=PF

Can money buy happiness? Since the invention of money, or nearly enough, people have been telling one another that it can't. Philosophers and gurus, holy books and self-help manuals have all warned of the futility of equating material gain with true well-being.

Modern research generally backs them up. Psychologists and economists have found that while money does matter to your sense of happiness, it doesn't matter that much. Beyond the point at which people have enough to comfortably feed, clothe, and house themselves, having more money - even a lot more money - makes them only a little bit happier. So there's quantitative proof for the preachings of St. Francis and the wisdom of the Buddha. Bad news for hard-charging bankers; good news for struggling musicians.

But starting to emerge now is a different answer to that age-old question. A few researchers are looking again at whether happiness can be bought, and they are discovering that quite possibly it can - it's just that some strategies are a lot better than others. Taking a friend to lunch, it turns out, makes us happier than buying a new outfit. Splurging on a vacation makes us happy in a way that splurging on a car may not.

"Just because money doesn't buy happiness doesn't mean money cannot buy happiness," says Elizabeth Dunn, a social psychologist and assistant professor at the University of British Columbia. "People just might be using it wrong."

Dunn and others are beginning to offer an intriguing explanation for the poor wealth-to-happiness exchange rate: The problem isn't money, it's us. For deep-seated psychological reasons, when it comes to spending money, we tend to value goods over experiences, ourselves over others, things over people. When it comes to happiness, none of these decisions are right: The spending that make us happy, it turns out, is often spending where the money vanishes and leaves something ineffable in its place.

Any attempt to put these findings into practice, however, has to contend with the subtle but powerful ways money itself channels our thinking, and the ways it plays on human attitudes about sharing and scarcity. Recent studies have suggested that merely thinking about money makes us more solitary and selfish, and steers us away from the spending that promises to make us happiest.

Figuring out how to clear this hurdle has implications for our daily budget decisions and our investments, and for how organizations from resorts to charities do business. Money is inseparable from our existence in society - we work for money, live on money, and hoard it and spend it for a tangled mix of reasons. As psychologists unpack these insights, their work offers a powerful new way to think about this complex and poorly understood relationship. And it gives us a chance to use our spending money, however much it may be, as a vehicle to a more fulfilling life rather than just a better accessorized one.

Despite millennia of folk wisdom on the topic, it wasn't until a decade ago that researchers started to take a hard look at whether money really does have anything to do with happiness. In the late 1990s, a psychologist named Martin Seligman founded the field of positive psychology, driven by the idea that psychologists had as much of a duty to figure out what made people happy as to study their problems. At the same time, a few economists were starting to borrow the tools of psychology to challenge some of the assumptions that their field had long held about human behavior - that people were rational calculators of cost and benefit, for example, and that looking at how people spent money could be a reliable indicator of their deeper desires.

Positive psychologists and so-called behavioral economists both turned their attention to the money-happiness nexus. Mapping financial statistics against people's self-reported happiness, the researchers sifted data from rich nations and poor nations, from people up and down the economic ladder, and from individuals as their economic fortunes improved or deteriorated. The connection between wealth and happiness, they found, was pretty weak.

"It's not a zero correlation, even at higher income levels, but it's not a very big correlation," says Sonja Lyubomirsky, a psychology professor at the University of California at Riverside and a leading happiness researcher. Money, she says, "matters less than we think it would."

But what if that wasn't the whole story? Dunn, of the University of British Columbia, remembers wondering a couple years ago whether money and happiness were necessarily so disconnected. Partly, she was inspired by a change in her own circumstances: She had just gotten hired as an assistant professor, her salary suddenly jumping from a post-doctoral researcher's $20,000 stipend to about four times that much. She found it hard to believe that there was nothing she could do with some of that new money to make herself happier.

What if, for example, she spent it not on a new flat-screen television or sectional sofa, but on other people? One of the most consistent findings of the happiness literature is that having a strong social network is an excellent predictor of happiness, and it seemed plausible that you could use money to buy happiness that way. She teamed up with Michael Norton, a psychologist and assistant professor at Harvard Business School, and the two embarked on a series of experiments to test whether spending money on others actually makes us happier than spending it on ourselves.

First, they surveyed 632 Americans on their general happiness, along with what they spent their money on, and found that higher "prosocial spending" - gifts for others and donations to charity - was indeed correlated with higher self-reported happiness. They followed this up with a more detailed look at 16 workers before and after they received a profit-sharing bonus from their company. They found that the only factor that reliably predicted which workers would be happy six to eight weeks after the bonus was their prosocial spending - the more money people spent on charity and gifts for others, the happier they were.

But was the happiness caused by giving money away, or were charitable people simply happier to start with? To show a causative link, they then performed an experiment in which volunteer test subjects were given a small windfall of $5 to $20. Some of the subjects, chosen at random, were told to spend it on a bill, an expense, or a gift for themselves. The others were told to buy a gift for someone else or make a charitable donation. Afterwards, the second group - the ones who had given the money away - reported being significantly happier than those who had spent the money on their own needs.

Dunn and Norton published their results in the journal Science in March 2008. The lesson of their study, says Dunn, is clear. Money makes you most happy if you don't spend it on yourself.

"By that I do not mean give all your money away and live in a shack," she says. "I just mean think about increasing it slightly. Just reallocating as little as $5 on a given day can make a difference in happiness."

Another theme that has emerged in similar research is that money spent on experiences - vacations or theater tickets or meals out - makes you happier than money spent on material goods. Leaf Van Boven, an associate psychology professor at the University of Colorado, and Thomas Gilovich, chair of the psychology department at Cornell University, have run surveys asking people about past purchases and how happy they made them.

"We generally found very consistent evidence that experiences made people happier than material possessions they had invested in," says Van Boven.

Why? For one thing, Van Boven and Gilovich argue, experiences are inherently more social - when we vacation or eat out or go to the movies it's usually with other people, and we're liable also to relive the experience when we see those people again. And past experiences can work as a sort of social adhesive even with people who didn't participate with us, providing stories and conversational fodder in a way that a new watch or speedboat rarely can.

In addition, other work by Van Boven suggests that experiences don't usually trigger the same sort of pernicious comparisons that material possessions do. We like our car less whenever we catch a glimpse of our neighbor's newer, nicer car, but we don't like our honeymoon any less because our neighbor went on a fancier one.

And while we quickly grow accustomed to a new suit or a bigger house, no matter how much we originally loved it, experiences instead tend to get burnished in our memory - a year after a vacation, we look back not on the stress of dealing with lost luggage or the fights over which way the hotel was, but the beauty of the scenery or the exotic flavors of the food.

Why, then, don't we already spend more of our money this way? Of course, people do give to charity and go on vacations and treat their friends to the occasional dinner. But if the goal is to buy happiness, we still spend more on stuff and on ourselves than we should.

Part of the problem is that happiness isn't necessarily what's motivating us when we reach for our wallets. Much of the impetus for discretionary spending - even for seeming essentials like cars, houses, and clothes - comes from a desire to send certain signals about our buying power and our tastes. We might mistake that motivation for happiness, or for having a better life, but it's driven by something else, a human need to compete or to fit in. And $5,000 worth of new stuff, or even $500,000 worth, is unlikely to permanently quell that need.

Even if we learn to recognize that impulse for what it is, however, money has a psychological power of its own. It seems that simply thinking about money makes us less likely to do prosocial things. Kathleen Vohs, a psychologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota Carlson School of Management, has done studies in which people were primed to think of money - by either reading text that subtly evoked it or by being surreptitiously shown images of dollar bills - while doing various tasks. Having money on one's mind, Vohs found, made people harder-working, even more resistant to pain, but it also made them more solitary. They were less likely to offer help to others or to donate money. They even chose to put more physical distance between themselves and other people when talking to them.

Paradoxically, then, money itself blinds us to the ways we might spend it to make ourselves happiest.

"People may know that being nice to other people makes them happy, but money, in and of itself, turns us around and makes us think about buying more stuff," says Norton of Harvard Business School.

The research, however, does suggest a few ways to spring ourselves from this bind. One intriguing possibility is that workplaces could change to encourage more prosocial spending in their workers. Dunn and Norton have argued, for example, that companies can improve their employees' emotional well-being by shifting some of their budget for charitable giving so that individual employees are given sums to donate, leaving them happier even as the charities of their choice benefit.

And on a more personal, everyday level, when we're drawn to a new pair of designer sunglasses, we could try to factor in the psychological return that we might get from a similar sum spent on a night out with friends.

Thinkers are trying to figure out how to incorporate these sorts of findings into a new model of consumption. Norton, along with Dan Ariely, a behavioral economist and professor at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business, has coined the term "conceptual consumption" to describe our willingness to spend real money on abstract goods. Among other things, they argue, it helps explain the sort of long-term payoff we get from a memorable dinner with a loved one. It's a testament to the power of such conceptual goods, they argue, that in certain settings we privilege the concept over actual physical consumption - such as when we decide not to go back to the restaurant where we had the special dinner because we're afraid it would dilute the memory. The more we learn about consumer behavior, Ariely and Norton argue, the more we will realize that nearly every decision we make as consumers is primarily conceptual.

Whether or not that turns out to be true, an important change is afoot in work like Dunn and Norton's and Van Boven and Gilovich's. Talking about money and happiness in the same breath, it turns out, isn't necessarily a surrender to crass materialism - it can also be a route to a new and more humane way to think about vitally important things like consumption, satisfaction, investment, and value.

It can also turn the familiar logic of money, prudence, and charity almost on its head. Seen this way, blowing money on a bar crawl with friends isn't necessarily a waste of your hard-earned paycheck - it's something of an investment. And a generous philanthropic donation is also an act of hedonism even more gratifying than a new Lexus or a handmade watch. Making money vanish can have a payoff every bit as real, and possibly more beneficial, than putting it somewhere to make it grow. You just have to do it the right way.

"It's funny, everyone keeps saying money doesn't make you happy, but money can change the world," says Lyubomirsky. "It can support political candidates, it can drive change. And it can't buy me love, but it can certainly get you to meet people and have dates."

Drake Bennett is the staff writer for Ideas. E-mail drbennett@globe.com.  

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Davetrek-Friends" group.
To post to this group, send email to davetrek-friends@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to davetrek-friends+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/davetrek-friends?hl=en.

cute - Weekdays, the Rabbi Dined Out

Weekdays, the Rabbi Dined Out

AS in many New York neighborhoods, summer brings a demographic shift in Borough Park, a predominantly Hasidic section of Brooklyn. The playgrounds are quieter than usual and the familiar sight of women dressed in wigs and long skirts, surrounded by children, is less common.

In July and August, many families there head for bungalow colonies in the Catskills, leaving behind men who work all week and reunite with their wives and children on the weekends. They call themselves summertime bachelors.

Weekday nights can be lonely for these men, who are used to returning home from work to a lively family dinner. But consolation can be found at a handful of informal supper clubs that have cropped up in Borough Park.

"The men here, their families remain upstate, so they're looking for some good, reasonably priced food, and for some company," said Rabbi Shlomo Weiss, who broke bread one recent weeknight with perhaps a dozen other men in the basement of a large building on 53rd Street near 13th Avenue that is usually used for religious education. It has been running a summer dining program for roughly 25 years, and on a typical busy night feeds 200 people over the course of several hours.

Religious books and materials were cleared away and piled against the walls, and a half-dozen long tables with plastic tablecloths held bottles of seltzer, bowls of pickles, piles of rye bread and the occasional prayer book. A serving table had chafing dishes of knishes, breaded chicken and rice.

One by one, the bearded men, dressed in heavy black clothing, entered the cool basement area, exhaling as they escaped the summer heat. They pulled off their jackets and placed their black hats on the white plastic folding chairs.

"The men don't want to sit alone in some restaurant and pay high prices, so they come here," said Rabbi Weiss, 62, a life insurance salesman from Borough Park who has 14 children, most of whom are grown and married and, he added with a wink, provide him with plenty of grandchildren. Everyone in the basement room seemed to know him — actually, everyone seemed to know everyone, the men chatting in Yiddish throughout their meals.

The 53rd Street operation is run by Volvi Weiss, 33, of Borough Park, who works by day at a local lumberyard. He collects the suggested donation of $12 — although some men pay less, and some more, depending on their income. The cash register sits at the end of the serving table, next to a big bowl of matzo ball soup.

Such meals are generally available Monday through Thursday evenings in general-purpose rooms or basements of community centers. In the insular Hasidic community, the locations are often passed along by word of mouth. Typically, one enters through some nondescript doorway; the entrance to the building on 53rd Street is down a darkened alley littered with cigarette butts.

The summer bachelors — the men chuckle at the connotations of such a label — say that they find comfort in the steaming dishes of food, and from eating with other men who are also temporarily on their own.

"This is what we like, haimish food, not some fancy stuff they try to give you in restaurants," said Moses Leifer, 50, using a Yiddish word for homey. A manager of nursing homes, he was eating recently at the 53rd Street supper club; his family was in the Catskills. "Don't get me wrong: we also like the efficiency — you're in and out, one, two, three, and there's no waiting in line."

Some local organizations offer the men nighttime lectures and study groups, but for many of them, it is the meal programs that offer the most comfort. They are often run at a loss, as a community service, the organizers said.

"The house is empty, so you come here and you eat with people in the same situation and it makes the time pass quicker in the evening," said Meir Laufer, 34, another of those eating on 53rd Street. He works in banking; his wife and six children were in South Fallsburg.

Political candidates often drop by the dining halls to chat and campaign. This night, John Heyer, who is seeking the local City Council seat, spoke to the men and shook their hands.

Generally, each meal program is operated by a separate Hasidic sect. The one on 53rd Street is run by a division of the Satmar sect that follows Rabbi Aaron Teitelbaum, whose father, Rabbi Moses Teitelbaum, was a powerful Satmar leader. When the father died in 2006, his followers split into two groups: one loyal to Aaron, the other to Aaron's brother, Rabbi Zalmen Teitelbaum. Each brother claims to be the grand rabbi of the Satmar dynasty, and the split continues to be the subject of bitter debate.

Zalmen Teitelbaum's followers run a similar meal program nearby, but declined to let a reporter visit. When the men on 53rd Street heard this, they erupted.

"This proves we are the chosen ones," one diner joked. "You came to the real Satmar sect. The other ones kicked you out."

Another meal program, in a yeshiva on 18th Avenue, is run by the Ger sect; it is known for its copious food and for using real silverware, not plastic. On one recent night, the generous spread included herring, potato salad, pickles, pepper steak, three different chicken entrees, a plate of cold cuts, chicken soup, and rugelach for dessert.

The Ger program feeds perhaps 150 men a night for a suggested donation of $12. Regulars include Mayer Kagan, 39, a wristwatch seller whose wife and six children stay in a Catskill bungalow in Kiamesha Lake.

"I miss my family during the week, but I can come here and have company — we sit, we schmooze what's in the news," Mr. Kagan said.

Though less homey than the supper clubs, several restaurants in Borough Park have also become popular with the summer bachelors, including Big Fleishig's Express, a glatt kosher one on 16th Avenue.

A frequent customer, Mark Fuchs, said his wife and four small children were staying in a bungalow community in Monticello. After he finished his chicken dinner, his cellphone rang. It was his son Shloimy, 5, calling to show off his spelling skills. After hanging up, Mr. Fuchs sighed and said, "They're up there having a ball and I'm down here paying the bills."

Big Fleishig's owner, Moshe Samuel, works the counter and teases the men that they are helpless without their wives. "You should see them come in here, the first week their family is away," he said, while ringing up orders on Monday night. "They're like lost lambs. Their wives always tell them what to eat, so they can't even order for themselves."

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Davetrek-Friends" group.
To post to this group, send email to davetrek-friends@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to davetrek-friends+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/davetrek-friends?hl=en.

Do 20somethings need constant praise? the new 'greatest generation'

The Most-Praised Generation Goes to Work

Uber-stroked kids are reaching adulthood -- and now their bosses (and spouses) have to deal with them. Jeffrey Zaslow on 'applause notes,' celebrations assistants and ego-lifting dinnerware.

By JEFFREY ZASLOW  - Wall Street Journal
April 20, 2007; Page W1

You, You, You -- you really are special, you are! You've got everything going for you. You're attractive, witty, brilliant. "Gifted" is the word that comes to mind.

Childhood in recent decades has been defined by such stroking -- by parents who see their job as building self-esteem, by soccer coaches who give every player a trophy, by schools that used to name one "student of the month" and these days name 40.

Now, as this greatest generation grows up, the culture of praise is reaching deeply into the adult world. Bosses, professors and mates are feeling the need to lavish praise on young adults, particularly twentysomethings, or else see them wither under an unfamiliar compliment deficit.

Employers are dishing out kudos to workers for little more than showing up. Corporations including Lands' End and Bank of America are hiring consultants to teach managers how to compliment employees using email, prize packages and public displays of appreciation. The 1,000-employee Scooter Store Inc., a power-wheelchair and scooter firm in New Braunfels, Texas, has a staff "celebrations assistant" whose job it is to throw confetti -- 25 pounds a week -- at employees. She also passes out 100 to 500 celebratory helium balloons a week. The Container Store Inc. estimates that one of its 4,000 employees receives praise every 20 seconds, through such efforts as its "Celebration Voice Mailboxes."

Certainly, there are benefits to building confidence and showing attention. But some researchers suggest that inappropriate kudos are turning too many adults into narcissistic praise-junkies. The upshot: A lot of today's young adults feel insecure if they're not regularly complimented.

America's praise fixation has economic, labor and social ramifications. Adults who were overpraised as children are apt to be narcissistic at work and in personal relationships, says Jean Twenge, a psychology professor at San Diego State University. Narcissists aren't good at basking in other people's glory, which makes for problematic marriages and work relationships, she says.

Her research suggests that young adults today are more self-centered than previous generations. For a multiuniversity study released this year, 16,475 college students took the standardized narcissistic personality inventory, responding to such statements as "I think I am a special person." Students' scores have risen steadily since the test was first offered in 1982. The average college student in 2006 was 30% more narcissistic than the average student in 1982.

Praise Inflation

Employers say the praise culture can help them with job retention, and marriage counselors say couples often benefit by keeping praise a constant part of their interactions. But in the process, people's positive traits can be exaggerated until the words feel meaningless. "There's a runaway inflation of everyday speech," warns Linda Sapadin, a psychologist in Valley Stream, N.Y. These days, she says, it's an insult unless you describe a pretty girl as "drop-dead gorgeous" or a smart person as "a genius." "And no one wants to be told they live in a nice house," says Dr. Sapadin. "'Nice' was once sufficient. That was a good word. Now it's a put-down."

The Gottman Institute, a relationship-research and training firm in Seattle, tells clients that a key to marital happiness is if couples make at least five times as many positive statements to and about each other as negative ones. Meanwhile, products are being marketed to help families make praise a part of their daily routines. For $32.95, families can buy the "You Are Special Today Red Plate," and then select one worthy person each meal to eat off the dish.

But many young married people today, who grew up being told regularly that they were special, can end up distrusting compliments from their spouses. Judy Neary, a relationship therapist in Alexandria, Va., says it's common for her clients to say things like: "I tell her she's beautiful all the time, and she doesn't believe it." Ms. Neary suspects: "There's a lot of insecurity, with people wondering, 'Is it really true?'"

"Young married people who've been very praised in their childhoods, particularly, need praise to both their child side and their adult side," adds Dolores Walker, a psychotherapist and attorney specializing in divorce mediation in New York.

Employers are finding ways to adjust. Sure, there are still plenty of surly managers who offer little or no positive feedback, but many withholders are now joining America's praise parade to hold on to young workers. They're being taught by employee-retention consultants such as Mark Holmes, who encourages employers to give away baseball bats with engravings ("Thanks for a home-run job") or to write notes to employees' kids ("Thanks for letting dad work here. He's terrific!")

Bob Nelson, billed as "the Guru of Thank You," counsels 80 to 100 companies a year on praise issues. He has done presentations for managers of companies such as Walt Disney Co. and Hallmark Cards Inc., explaining how different generations have different expectations. As he sees it, those over age 60 tend to like formal awards, presented publicly. But they're more laid back about needing praise, and more apt to say: "Yes, I get recognition every week. It's called a paycheck." Baby boomers, Mr. Nelson finds, often prefer being praised with more self-indulgent treats such as free massages for women and high-tech gadgets for men.

Workers under 40, he says, require far more stroking. They often like "trendy, name-brand merchandise" as rewards, but they also want near-constant feedback. "It's not enough to give praise only when they're exceptional, because for years they've been getting praise just for showing up," he says.

Mr. Nelson advises bosses: If a young worker has been chronically late for work and then starts arriving on time, commend him. "You need to recognize improvement. That might seem silly to older generations, but today, you have to do these things to get the performances you want," he says. Casey Priest, marketing vice president for Container Store, agrees. "When you set an expectation and an employee starts to meet it, absolutely praise them for it," she says.

Sixty-year-old David Foster, a partner at Washington, D.C., law firm Miller & Chevalier, is making greater efforts to compliment young associates -- to tell them they're talented, hard-working and valued. It's not a natural impulse for him. When he was a young lawyer, he says, "If you weren't getting yelled at, you felt like that was praise."

But at a retreat a couple of years ago, the firm's 120 lawyers reached an understanding. Younger associates complained that they were frustrated; after working hard on a brief and handing it in, they'd receive no praise. The partners promised to improve "intergenerational communication." Mr. Foster says he feels for younger associates, given their upbringings. "When they're not getting feedback, it makes them very nervous."

Modern Pressures

Some younger lawyers are able to articulate the dynamics behind this. "When we were young, we were motivated by being told we could do anything if we believed in ourselves. So we respond well to positive feedback," explains 34-year-old Karin Crump, president of the 25,000-member Texas Young Lawyers Association.

Scott Atwood, president-elect of the Young Lawyers Division of the Florida Bar, argues that the yearning for positive input from superiors is more likely due to heightened pressure to perform in today's demanding firms. "It has created a culture where you have to have instant feedback or you'll fail," he says.

In fact, throughout history, younger generations have wanted praise from their elders. As Napoleon said: "A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon." But when it comes to praise today, "Gen Xers and Gen Yers don't just say they want it. They are also saying they require it," says Chip Toth, an executive coach based in Denver. How do young workers say they're not getting enough? "They leave," says Mr. Toth.

Many companies are proud of their creative praise programs. Since 2004, the 4,100-employee Bronson Healthcare Group in Kalamazoo, Mich., has required all of its managers to write at least 48 thank-you or praise notes to underlings every year.

Universal Studios Orlando, with 13,000 employees, has a program in which managers give out "Applause Notes," praising employees for work well done. Universal workers can also give each other peer-to-peer "S.A.Y. It!" cards, which stand for "Someone Appreciates You!" The notes are redeemed for free movie tickets or other gifts.

Bank of America has several formal rewards programs for its 200,000 employees, allowing those who receive praise to select from 2,000 gifts. "We also encourage managers to start every meeting with informal recognition," says Kevin Cronin, senior vice president of recognition and rewards. The company strives to be sensitive. When new employees are hired, managers are instructed to get a sense of how they like to be praised. "Some prefer it in public, some like it one-on-one in an office," says Mr. Cronin.

No More Red Pens

Some young adults are consciously calibrating their dependence on praise. In New York, Web-developer Mia Eaton, 32, admits that she loves being complimented. But she feels like she's living on the border between a twentysomething generation that requires overpraise and a thirtysomething generation that is less addicted to it. She recalls the pre-Paris Hilton, pre-reality-TV era, when people were famous -- and applauded -- for their achievements, she says. When she tries to explain this to younger colleagues, "they don't get it. I feel like I'm hurting their feelings because they don't understand the difference."

Young adults aren't always eager for clear-eyed feedback after getting mostly "atta-boys" and "atta-girls" all their lives, says John Sloop, a professor of rhetorical and cultural studies at Vanderbilt University. Another issue: To win tenure, professors often need to receive positive evaluations from students. So if professors want students to like them, "to a large extent, critical comments [of students] have to be couched in praise," Prof. Sloop says. He has attended seminars designed to help professors learn techniques of supportive criticism. "We were told to throw away our red pens so we don't intimidate students."

At the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, marketing consultant Steve Smolinsky teaches students in their late 20s who've left the corporate world to get M.B.A. degrees. He and his colleagues feel handcuffed by the language of self-esteem, he says. "You have to tell students, 'It's not as good as you can do. You're really smart, and can do better.'"

Mr. Smolinsky enjoys giving praise when it's warranted, he says, "but there needs to be a flip side. When people are lousy, they need to be told that." He notices that his students often disregard his harsher comments. "They'll say, 'Yeah, well...' I don't believe they really hear it."

In the end, ego-stroking may feel good, but it doesn't lead to happiness, says Prof. Twenge, the narcissism researcher, who has written a book titled "Generation Me: Why Today's Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled -- and More Miserable than Ever Before." She would like to declare a moratorium on "meaningless, baseless praise," which often starts in nursery school. She is unimpressed with self-esteem preschool ditties, such as the one set to the tune of "Frère Jacques": "I am special/ I am special/ Look at me..."

For now, companies like the Scooter Store continue handing out the helium balloons. Katie Lynch, 22, is the firm's "celebrations assistant," charged with throwing confetti, filling balloons and showing up at employees' desks to offer high-fives. "They all love it," she says, especially younger workers who "seem to need that pat on the back. They don't want to go unnoticed."

Ms. Lynch also has an urge to be praised. At the end of a long, hard day of celebrating others, she says she appreciates when her manager, Burton De La Garza, gives her a high-five or compliments her with a cellphone text message.

"I'll just text her a quick note -- 'you were phenomenal today,'" says Mr. De La Garza, "She thrives on that. We wanted to find what works for her, because she's completely averse to confetti."

Write to Jeffrey Zaslow at jeffrey.zaslow@wsj.com

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Davetrek-Friends" group.
To post to this group, send email to davetrek-friends@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to davetrek-friends+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/davetrek-friends?hl=en.